Darwin's (REAL) Theory

Evolution Of A Theory
Dawin Exposed

The so-called 'Theory of Evolution' has produced a debate that has raged since Charles Darwin ever-so-hesitantly proposed this theory in his book, ‘On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection’ and that was 1859 –

This debate EVOLVED into a very serious clash of "Creation vs. Evolution".

Let's begin with Darwin's "evidence" for his theory.

Take a close look at each bird, all of them finches seen by Darwin while he was traveling through the Galapagos Islands, about 150 years ago:

Darwin had theorized these birds were all from one common bird ancestor whose offspring had somehow managed to change the shape of their beaks to adapt to their various different environments.

His problem contained a number of false assumptions, not the least of which, is the fact that all of these birds were alive at the same time.

Another problem of his theory was shot down by a documentary filmed for educational TV and aired in October of 1998. I personally watched this program which was intended to deal with the subject of 'Global Warming' and 'El Nino' (a strange weather phenomenon causing weird conditions at various times throughout the year in Central and South America).

During the program, the announcer was talking about the amazing changes of the beaks of the birds on the Galapagos Islands.

Due to the severe changes in the eco-system the foliage had changed drastically, but at the same time so had the beaks of these finches.

The announcer mentions that in less than a few months (not millions of years) these beaks had changed so rapidly, the newl baby birds hatched out already equipped with the new beaks ready to handle the changes to their surroundings.
How is that possible? Miracle?

He even commented this would have a big impact on Darwin's Theory.

Let's take a look one theory regarding the neck of the giraffe and then think about it for a second..

Is this really likely?

Take a minute to consider what these guys are offering to us. The original animal was small and got bigger, just do it could reach the food. Uh, that might make more sense if they said it was tall and got smaller as the food got closer to the ground.

Why?

Because if even one generation couldn't reach the food, they would have all died. The 'Natural Selection' would be more like 'Natural Decomposition'.

Now keep in mind THESE ARE ALL - ONLY THEORIES

Even though they try to cover up the word 'Theory' with so many of their 'observations', they still have the problem of two things:

1. Changing their 'theories' every time there is clear evidence against their position

2. Making up things to fit their stories and then covering up when they are found out.

Proof?

Glad you asked. Now take a look at these two very clear examples of lies, fabrications and coverups for the so-called 'numerous observations' of things in nature.

First - The 'Piltdown Man' Theory in England

From Wikipedia -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man

"Discovered" in 1912 in a gravel pit in Piltdown, England - Piltdown Man was exposed as a hoax in 1953.

The whole 'evolution theory' seemed to be proven by bone fragments presented as the fossilised remains of a previously unknown early human. These fragments consisted of parts of a skull and jawbone, said to have been collected in 1912 from a gravel pit at Piltdown, East Sussex, England. The Latin name Eoanthropus dawsoni ("Dawson's dawn-man", after the collector Charles Dawson) was given to the specimen. The significance of the specimen remained the subject of controversy until it was exposed in 1953 as a forgery, consisting of the lower jawbone of an orangutan deliberately combined with the skull of a fully developed modern human. The Piltdown hoax is perhaps the most famous paleoanthropological hoax ever to have been perpetrated. It is prominent for two reasons: the attention paid to the issue of human evolution, and the length of time (more than 40 years) that elapsed from its discovery to its full exposure as a forgery.

Note: many more theories were based on these "findings" including papers, thesis for Ph.Ds and very provocative headlines with profound affect on folks in those days.

Politicians and pastors alike, used all to this attention to further their individual causes. Take for instance, the famous "Scopes Monkey Trial".

On Our Website at: http://scienceislam.com

Evolution or Creation
(Islam Proves Both Exist)
Allah is Both: The Creator & The Evolver

Scopes Monkey Trial, was a famous American legal case in 1925 in which a high school teacher, John Scopes, was accused of violating Tennessee's Butler Act, which made it unlawful to teach human evolution in any state-funded school.[1] The trial was deliberately staged in order to attract publicity to the small town of Dayton, Tennessee, where it was held. Scopes was unsure whether he had ever actually taught evolution, but he purposefully incriminated himself so that the case could have a defendant.

Second - The 'Nebraska Man' Theory in (of all places) Nebraska:

Third - "LUCY" The forensically Fraudulent Pseudo-Scientific Reconstructions of Mankind…

http://www.omniology.com/Lucyism.html

Check out the 'Walking Evolution of WOman-kind':
Insult to Women & Insult to Our Intelegence Too!

From very few pieces of skeletal remains, "scientists" were able to reconstruct the exact image of what they wanted to believe the early "humans" were like.

Of course, when discovered to be fraud, they were quick to note these were actually a type of 'hominid" and not actually "homosapien" as some had believed.

Evolution - Creation (Or Both?)
[click here to EVOLVE]