The United States Supreme Court once ruled that = Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, was one of the most influencial of all Law Givers in the history of the world.
That's right, the same supreme court that has recently been heariing testimony about the world's fastest growing religion - ISLAM - as being a terrorist cult and promotes violence, terrorism and is against freedom and democracy.
The same court hearing petitions and proposed bills to restrict the religious freedoms of Muslims or anyone following the "Shari'ah" (means: God's Law). But what about the "Torah" (means: God's Law)?
Note: a number of states have already passed laws forbidding the following of Shari'ah.
And the same court once made up of people who once proclaimed openly, Muhammad (peace be upon him) to the of the greatest men ever lived. [click]
How could this be?
It was actually back in 1935, back when the news reporters were a bit more responsible in verifying their sources of information and also a bit less prejudiced (at least toward religions). At that time Islam was seen as a middle eastern religion and not much of a threat to the Judao-Christian faith here in America.
Today we are even seeing vilolations of our own constitution by the very people who took their oath of office, swearing to uphold the very same rights of the people they now persecute with their unwarranted hatred.
Speaking of oaths of office, did you know, the Quran of Islam has also been used in place of the Bible for certain members of the congress to swear their oath of office upon accepting their positions [Thomas Jefferson did not use the Quran to be sworn in. He had a Quran in his collection of books, and it was Rep. Keith Ellison who used the Quran to be sworn in. (note for correction below)].
Check it out and see for yourself how things have 'changed' and attitutudes have been severely altered and modified to adjust to the popular vote, so to speak.
What is next? Will they take away our rights to speak the truth (lies are ok, so why not the truth?) and what about the right to bear arms? Will they try to control the right to have fire arms? Oh wait, never mind, they are already doing that.
What's next after this? Will they tell us how to dress nor not dress (hijab? niqab? long robes?)
Let's do our best to get the correct message of the real Islam out there. That is what is missing. There is no real voice telling Americans - What is Islam? & Who are the real Muslims?
Here are some aids and tips:
www.WhatsIslam.com - www.ShareIslam.com. www.GodAllah.com - www.ScienceIslam.com - www.ProphetOfIslam.com - www.ConvertsReverts.com - www.TubeIslam.com - www.IslamNewsRoom.com - www.IslamTomorrow.com - www.GuideUS.TV
EXTRA: What Is Your State Planning About Shar'ah Law? - Find Out
Line Up of Bans on Shari'ah Law - State by State
- Source: Gavel to Gavel
- Article: Bans on Court Use of Shari'ah International Law
What to watch for - Law & Court Decisions of Other Nations; Specifically Prohibiting Use of Foreign Law (read: Shari'ah)
This year’s batch of bans of sharia/international law use by state courts looks very different than those of the past several years.
After criticism that:
a) past versions would effectively cripple businesses who have to sign international contracts
b) that bans on references to the law and court decisions of other nations would make the judicial determinations of tribal courts in the U.S. enforceable, most such bills have been completely rewritten.
Specifically, most now specify the prohibition on the use of foreign law/sharia
- - applies only to a particular case type (such as family law or domestic relations)
- - does not infringe on the right to contract
- - does not apply to not apply to a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, etc.
- - does not apply to recognition or use of tribal court decisions in state courts
- - does not apply to ecclesiastical matters within a denomination
Even with these modifications, as in the past, most such bills are failing to advance in the legislatures.
List of Bills
Bill |
Does not affect right to contract freely/contract provisions |
Does not apply to corporations |
Does not apply to tribal court decisions |
Does not apply to ecclesiastical matters/religious orgs |
Other items |
Status |
X |
X |
|
|
Full faith and credit with other states suspended if they use international law |
In Senate Judiciary Committee. |
|
X |
X |
|
|
Full faith and credit with other states suspended if they use international law |
In Senate Judiciary Committee. |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
Limited to Family law. Does not apply to use of English common law. |
Approved by Judiciary Committee’s Civil Justice Subcommittee 2/7/13. |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
Limited to Family law. Does not apply to use of English common law. |
In Senate Judiciary Committee. |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
In House Judiciary Committee. |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
In Senate Rules Committee. |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
In Senate Judiciary Committee. |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
In House Judiciary Committee. |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
In Senate (no committee). |
|
X |
|
|
|
Specifically uses word “sharia” |
Died in House Judiciary A Committee. |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
|
Died in House Judiciary A Committee. |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Died in House Judiciary A Committee. |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
Died in Senate Judiciary A Committee. |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Approved by House Judiciary Committee 2/6/13. |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
In House States’ Rights Committee. |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
In House Rules Committee. |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
|
In House Rules Committee. |
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
In Senate Judiciary Committee. |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Approved by Senate Judiciary Committee 2/12/13. |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
In Senate Judiciary Committee. |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
In Senate Judiciary Committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In House Judiciary Committee. |
|
X |
X |
|
|
Limited to family law (divorce, marriage, parent-child relationship) |
In House Judiciary Committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In House (no committee). |
|
X |
X |
|
|
Limited to family law (divorce, marriage, parent-child relationship) |
In Senate State Affairs Committee. |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
In House Judiciary Committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
Does not apply to use of English common law, if enacted |
Killed by full House 1/24/13. |
|
|
|
|
|
Does not apply to use of English common law, if enacted |
Died in House Judiciary Committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
Limited to Domestic Relations (marriage, divorce, custody, visitation, support, adoption) |
Withdrawn at sponsor’s request. |
Comments
Thomas Jefferson did not use the Quran to be sworn in. He had a Quran in his collection of books which Rep. Keith Ellison used to be sworn in.
*** EDITOR: You are right. Thank you for reminding us and posting here! Jazakallah khair.
there been a moral decay in the US ever since the zionists took over. looks like america is turning into israel.
RSS feed for comments to this post